The only time vocal inflections such as uptalk or vocal fry become a problem is when they are overused and, as a result, become the only thing our audience can hear.

It is a natural part of speech and, when used correctly, it can add essential variety to the vocal delivery of our message, which, in turn, makes us more interesting to listen to. You may be surprised to hear that Hillary Clinton uses vocal fry as well. As you can see in Figure 2, BritneyвЂ™s pitch is only slightly higher than HillaryвЂ™s and is actually lower than the average of the women in our communications database of business professionals. Surprisingly, the characteristics of BritneyвЂ™s voice are not that different from Hillary. One would imagine HillaryвЂ™s voice to be much more authoritative than Britney Spears. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton represents a powerful female politician demonstrating leadership and authority. Other examples of celebrities known for using vocal fry are Kim Kardashian, Zoey Deschanel, and Ke$ha (all of whom are in their late 20вЂ™s or early 30вЂ™s). Britney is one person the media consistently points to as an example of vocal fry.

Today, vocal fry is the fad everyone is concerned about. As her pitch has lowered, a new trend has emerged. During the late 90вЂ™s (when her voice was higher), uptalk was in vogue. You can see the effect her changing voice has had on young girls through the popularity of vocal fads. As her voice has gotten older, her natural pitch has become deeper. As demonstrated in Figure 1, when she first became popular as a teenager, her vocal range was very high. Girls mimic her dress, her actions, and even the way she speaks. Why? It may be a result of learned behavior from celebrities and politicians.Д«ritney Spears has always been considered a trend setter. Although women cannot easily change their natural vocal pitch, by using vocal fry they may actually be able to project the authority that is often associated with a deeper male voice.ДЄlthough they can be found in other demographics, currently, these communication trends are associated with young women in their late teens or early 20вЂ™s. Studies from the 80вЂ™s described vocal fry as being a вЂњrobust marker of male speechвЂќ. Vocal fry is associated with a lower pitch, which is primarily a male characteristic. By phrasing a statement as a question, you are inviting others to share their opinions and partake in the conversation. Uptalk can be used to check if the person you are talking to understands what youвЂ™re saying, without having to continually say вЂњdo you understand?вЂќ or вЂњdo you agree?вЂќ It is also a way to be more inclusive. So why have these вЂњfadsвЂќ lasted for so long? One theory is that there is perceived utility in both of them. YouвЂ™d think that as women advance in the work place and in the public sphere, theyвЂ™d leave this kind of girl talk behind. Both vocal mannerisms are often described as annoying, making the speaker seem insecure, immature, and even unintelligent. AUSTIN, ApвЂ“ Why have young women continued to talk like Valley Girls long after other vocal fads from the same era, like surfer slang, have come and gone? Many young women still converse in uptalk, the rising intonation that makes statements sound like questions, sprinkling their comments with vocal fry, the creaky, low-pitched voice that sounds a little like gagging.

Hillary clinton voice change